<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Look in My Mirror</title>
	<link>http://www.baldowski.org</link>
	<description>Brian Baldowski</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Myth of the Passionate President</title>
		<link>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/26/the-myth-of-the-passionate-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/26/the-myth-of-the-passionate-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baldowski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/26/the-myth-of-the-passionate-president/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was watching the last part of The American President, the movie starring Michael Douglas and Annette Benning.&#160;&#160; It began to make me think about the idea of the passionate president, the man who goes out and says what he feels and lets the chips fall where they may.&#160; We love that idea, don&#8217;t we.&#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching the last part of The American President, the movie starring Michael Douglas and Annette Benning.&#160;&#160; It began to make me think about the idea of the passionate president, the man who goes out and says what he feels and lets the chips fall where they may.&#160; We love that idea, don&#8217;t we.&#160; We think it would be refreshing to hear a politician come out and say exactly what they mean and do exactly what they say they will do.&#160; It stirs our hearts.&#160; It makes us go &#8220;Right on.&#160; I may not agree with him, but I like him for telling the truth.&#8221;&#160; We watch these movies and wish our politicians were more like that.&#160; One day we we would like a politician to have a speech dedicated to what they believe, not what we want to hear.&#160; At least for the few minutes after the movie is over.</p>

	<p>In real life, what do we want?&#160; We want politicians to pander to our every whims.&#160; We want a candidate that will say, &#8220;I&#8217;ll give you a tax break.&#8221;&#160; rather than the politician that says, &#8220;It is tough but we can get through this.&#8221;&#160; No, in real life we want someone that will tell us exactly what we want to hear.&#160; We want someone who can attack their opponent the best.&#160; The person that can paint the worst picture about the opposition.</p>

	<p>The myth we hold dear is the very image we run from in real life.&#160; What would happen if a candidate told us everything they believe, with no hidden agenda?&#160; They would never be president.&#160; That is the world we live in today.&#160; Unfortunately, today, the line that can get you elected is &#8220;Ask not what you can do for your country, but what can your country do for you?&#8221; </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/26/the-myth-of-the-passionate-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clinton Hit-lists?</title>
		<link>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/12/clinton-hit-lists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/12/clinton-hit-lists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baldowski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/12/clinton-hit-lists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now the news networks and papers are telling stories about the &#8220;hit-lists&#8221; Clinton supporters are creating to target people they thought were loyal or should be loyal to Hillary during her election campaign.&#160; The lists seem to target all the women in the democratic party that didn&#8217;t support her.&#160; Was it expected that women would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the news networks and papers are telling stories about the &#8220;hit-lists&#8221; Clinton supporters are creating to target people they thought were loyal or should be loyal to Hillary during her election campaign.&#160; The lists seem to target all the women in the democratic party that didn&#8217;t support her.&#160; Was it expected that women would support Clinton solely because she is a woman.&#160; Where is the idea that you support the candidate that best suits your political beliefs, despite race, color, gender, religion, etc&#8230;&#160; It is absurd to target people simply because they are of your gender but didn&#8217;t support you.&#160; Of course Obama supporters seem to be doing the same thing to blacks who did not support Obama.&#160; Does he have a right to all black votes because he is black?&#160; No, he should expect support from the people who share his views, or even those who despise McCain&#8217;s views.</p>

	<p>The media, of course, feeds this idea.&#160; They point out that states with a large black population are probably going to swing to Obama, as if the voters are lemmings that follow even though they don&#8217;t agree they should jump off the cliff.&#160; Same with the idea that white working class voters will not vote for Obama because he is black.&#160; It is a disgrace the way media and supporters of different candidates spin things.</p>

	<p>The question I have is this, if white working class voters have been traditional Democrats, don&#8217;t you think they will support the Democratic nominee?&#160; Many people seem to think that Clinton should be on the ticket because she carried certain states in the primary.&#160; This is a fallacy.&#160; The two candidates were both Democrats and the primaries, for the most part, included only Democrats, and in a few states Independents, and in even fewer states other registered parties.&#160; Most though were solely Democratic.&#160; So the point is, you can look at the number of people who voted in the states and assume at least 90% of those people will vote for which ever won the nomination, because they are Democrats and share the values of the Democratic party.&#160; If they didn&#8217;t share the Democratic values, then likely they would not be registered Democrats.</p>

	<p>I am a registered Republican.&#160; I personally supported Mike Huckabee.&#160; I will vote for John McCain because I share more in common with him than I do Obama.&#160; Do I agree with everything John McCain stands for? No, but I agree with enough.&#160; The only other person I might consider voting for would be Bob Barr, the libertarian candidate.&#160; I do not think he will win and McCain might just need every vote he can get in my state.&#160; But my support for him is not based on him being a white male.&#160; Personally, I would love <span class="caps">JC </span>Watts to run.&#160; Everything I have seen about him, I like him and everything I have ever heard him say, and you know what, he&#8217;s black.&#160; I think McCain should select him as running mate.&#160; It would be a great ticket.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/12/clinton-hit-lists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/11/121/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/11/121/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baldowski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[currently reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/11/121/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6/11/08 True Believers by Joe Queenan.&#160; It is a look at why fans follow certain teams, even if the teams are abysmal, ie the Cubs.&#160; It was written before the Red Sox recent streak of World Series wins so it is a little dated that way.&#160; I let my sister borrow my Hitler book I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6/11/08 <a href="http://www.amazon.com/True-Believers-Tragic-Inner-Sports/dp/B000C4SYKC/ref=pd_bbs_7?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1213187419&#038;sr=8-7">True Believers </a>by Joe Queenan.&#160; It is a look at why fans follow certain teams, even if the teams are abysmal, ie the Cubs.&#160; It was written before the Red Sox recent streak of World Series wins so it is a little dated that way.&#160; I let my sister borrow my Hitler book I was going to read so I haven&#8217;t gotten back to that yet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/11/121/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the Internet Change Our Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/11/does-the-internet-change-our-brain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/11/does-the-internet-change-our-brain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baldowski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/11/does-the-internet-change-our-brain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The&#160; article&#160; Is Google Making Us Stupid? suggests it is possible the Internet is changing our brains..&#160; Think about the way people communicate and receive information.&#160; Also, look at what the most popular videos are on the web.&#160; Plus, there is a proliferation of TV news shows dedicated to the youtube and videos posted to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The&#160; <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google">article</a>&#160; Is Google Making Us Stupid? suggests it is possible the Internet is changing our brains..&#160; Think about the way people communicate and receive information.&#160; Also, look at what the most popular videos are on the web.&#160; Plus, there is a proliferation of TV news shows dedicated to the youtube and videos posted to the web.&#160; It shows a definite shift to the Internet, and not print media, as our source of information.&#160; Think about how often you use the Internet and what it does to your reading and social interactions.&#160; Are the different than when you didn&#8217;t use the Internet that much?&#160; It is interesting to consider.</p>

	<p>ps I just ran a the spell check for the post.&#160; Everytime I wrote internet, it corrected me by capitalizing the &#8220;i&#8221;&#160; I think the internet is getting pushy.&#160; Is is really a proper name?&#160; Wait, <span class="caps">HAL</span> is calling me.&#160; Got to go.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/11/does-the-internet-change-our-brain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prison Skew Job Report&#8230;huh?</title>
		<link>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/09/prison-skew-job-reporthuh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/09/prison-skew-job-reporthuh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baldowski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/09/prison-skew-job-reporthuh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following article&#160;Prisons Said to Skew Jobless Rate, in the News and Observer, incensed me so much I had to take a day or two to write about it.&#160; The article basically says that if you included prisoners and military to the number of of unemployed people it would increase the jobless rate.&#160; No duh.&#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/nation_world/story/1098168.html">article</a>&#160;<u>Prisons Said to Skew Jobless Rate</u>, in the News and Observer, incensed me so much I had to take a day or two to write about it.&#160; The article basically says that if you included prisoners and military to the number of of unemployed people it would increase the jobless rate.&#160; No duh.&#160; If you add a million and a half, or more, people to the number of people looking for work you it would increase the jobless rate.</p>

	<p>If you add the number of illegal aliens, wait, undocumented workers I mean, then it would affect the job market too.&#160; I think this is an attempt either point out the researchers belief too many people are in prison or an attempt to show the economy is weaker than we think.</p>

	<p>The problem with the report, prisoners are not eligible to work so they can not be include in the jobless rate.&#160; Military people are already working.&#160; If anything they should be added as employed workers.&#160; They are working after all.&#160; But they are not eligible to be included in the employment rate also.</p>

	<p>So to sum up, when you include all categories that are eligible to be counted, the jobless rate is 5%.&#160; You can not get around that number by adding people who are not eligible to be counted.&#160; The economy may be weak but it is growing.&#160; We are not in a recession, we are not growing at a fast rate though.&#160; Nothing will change that fact.&#160; When the oil bubble bursts and the housing market corrects itself, the economy will start growing faster.&#160; So right now, we have to deal with what is given to us, not what a person wishes was the story.</p>

	<p>If I was incoherent in the post I&#8217;m sorry, my blood began to boil again thinking about the &#038;*$%@#@ (bad word) research.&#160; Hey, they could have given me the money they spent on the report and I could have told them in a couple of days, I would draw it out for show, that if you add prisoners to the the unemployment numbers it would show&#160; a larger percent of unemployed.&#160; Sheesh, such idiots, such lack of common sense.&#160; Give me a break.</p>

	<p>I think part of my anger comes from the fact they spent good money to such a stupid research.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/09/prison-skew-job-reporthuh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Children as Political Ping-Pongs.</title>
		<link>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/04/children-as-political-ping-pongs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/04/children-as-political-ping-pongs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 16:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baldowski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/04/children-as-political-ping-pongs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The article&#160;in the News and Observer about graduation rates is just one of the many articles that have been published lately showing that schools are just convenient tools for local politicians to get their name in the paper and try to increase their power.&#160; It also shows the arrogance of both the Wake County School [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/news/education/wake/story/1095659.html">article</a>&#160;in the News and Observer about graduation rates is just one of the many articles that have been published lately showing that schools are just convenient tools for local politicians to get their name in the paper and try to increase their power.&#160; It also shows the arrogance of both the Wake County School Board and Wake County Commissioners.&#160; Neither side has a claim to righteousness in the battle over school funding.&#160; I am sick in tired of the scare tactics used by both sides to try to gain power and prestige in positions where the welfare of their citizens should be the highest priority.&#160; This is only one of the many battles being waged in Wake County and Raleigh in which people are making outrageous claims to gain political capital.&#160; Think about the people you serve not your own egotistical desires.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/04/children-as-political-ping-pongs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexism&#8230; Where is it?</title>
		<link>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/03/sexism-where-is-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/03/sexism-where-is-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baldowski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/03/sexism-where-is-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am puzzled over the allegations of sexism many Hillary Clinton supporters have been making the past week.&#160; Many have said the media is responsible for the comments.&#160; I am wondering where the are the examples?&#160; I watch Foxnews, MSNBC and CNN fairly regularly.&#160; I don&#8217;t see any of sexism.&#160; I have seen people question [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am puzzled over the allegations of sexism many Hillary Clinton supporters have been making the past week.&#160; Many have said the media is responsible for the comments.&#160; I am wondering where the are the examples?&#160; I watch Foxnews, <span class="caps">MSNBC</span> and <span class="caps">CNN</span> fairly regularly.&#160; I don&#8217;t see any of sexism.&#160; I have seen people question her ability based on voting and past performance.&#160; I have seen people question her personality and integrity.&#160; I have seen many reports along those lines.&#160; But I have also seen similar reports about the other candidates.&#160; I am worried that the race will devolve into a scenario where any criticism of Clinton will be termed sexist.&#160; Just as any criticism of Obama is considered racist.&#160; I believe that voting records in all levels of government and business dealings, and even personal relationships should be open for discussion.&#160; They all give us insight into the type of person the candidates are.&#160; To deem a legitimate questions racist or sexist because of the person they are directed at is dishonest and disingenuous.</p>

	<p>And to answer some specific allegations about Obama, the church he attends is a legitimate target.&#160; The preaching at the church and the tolerance he gives to the messages shows the type of person he really is inside.&#160; Just like Bill Clinton lying under oath showed the type of person he was.&#160; If I was involved in a church where constant hatred or racism was being taught I should be questioned about it,&#160;because I have aligned myself with an organization that is questionable.&#160; I am not as concerned about friends candidates have.&#160; There were many friends I have had whose politics I despised but they were nice people.&#160; That is different.&#160; But, if I align myself with an organization then there is valid criticism.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/03/sexism-where-is-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/116/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/116/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baldowski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[currently reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/116/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[6/1/08 Men at Arms&#160;by Terry Pratchett.&#160; I needed a quick read and Pratchett&#8217;s books are always entertaining and insightful.&#160; Is there a king in Ankh-Morpork?&#160; One man thinks so.&#160; See this reading guide&#160;to pick an order to read the books.&#160; There is one book this does not include and that is the newest Making Money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6/1/08 <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Men-at-Arms-Terry-Pratchett/dp/0061092193/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1212333458&#038;sr=8-1">Men at Arms</a>&#160;by Terry Pratchett.&#160; I needed a quick read and Pratchett&#8217;s books are always entertaining and insightful.&#160; Is there a king in Ankh-Morpork?&#160; One man thinks so.&#160; See this <a href="http://www.lspace.org/books/reading-order-guides/the-discworld-reading-order-guide-1-5.pdf">reading guide</a>&#160;to pick an order to read the books.&#160; There is one book this does not include and that is the newest Making Money which should be included in the Industrial Revolution line.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/116/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/115/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baldowski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[currently reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/115/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[5/27/08 Hood by Stephen R Lawhead.&#160; A retelling of the Robin Hood story, set in Wales.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5/27/08 <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Hood-King-Raven-Trilogy-Book/dp/B00164EAY6/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1212333312&#038;sr=8-1">Hood</a> by Stephen R Lawhead.&#160; A retelling of the Robin Hood story, set in Wales.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats in Michigan and Florida</title>
		<link>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/democrats-in-michigan-and-florida/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/democrats-in-michigan-and-florida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Baldowski</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/democrats-in-michigan-and-florida/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you watched the rules committee meeting yesterday dealing with delegates from Michigan and Florida I think you got an entertaining show and possibly a look at the fracturing of a party.&#160; The only way I foresee the Democrats unifying is if either candidate drops out and urges their supporters to support the other one.&#160; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you watched the rules committee meeting yesterday dealing with delegates from Michigan and Florida I think you got an entertaining show and possibly a look at the fracturing of a party.&#160; The only way I foresee the Democrats unifying is if either candidate drops out and urges their supporters to support the other one.&#160; But neither candidate seems willing to do that right now.</p>

	<p>The Democratic parties in the Michigan and Florida also need to be commended for bringing this about.&#160; They are like petulant children who purposefully knocked over their milk thinking that it would be okay, someone else would clean it up.&#160; When they realized no one else was going to grab a rag to wipe up the milk, they began crying over the fact they had no milk any more.&#160; They tried to get an adult to clean up the milk, but the adult could only get half the milk back into the cup.&#160; But they are still crying because they didn&#8217;t get all their milk back.</p>

	<p>A novel concept I had not heard yet was the Republicans made us do it.&#160; That was the cry from Florida.&#160; Blame it on the Republican legislature.&#160; But I had never once heard that as a reason the primaries were held early in the state.&#160; It seems they are grasping at straws to find&#160; someone to blame, other then themselves.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baldowski.org/2008/06/01/democrats-in-michigan-and-florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
